External action execution with conversational agent

ABSTRACT

One embodiment provides a method, including: receiving an input from a first user requesting information; generating a conversation model from a dialog that occurs between the user and a human agent; recording the human agent performing an external action required to respond to the input; mapping steps performed during performance of the external action to conversation slots within the dialog; generating an integrated interpretable conversation model comprising a dialog and action script; receiving, at a conversational agent system, a subsequent input from a second user requesting similar information to the information requested by the first user; and providing, by the conversational agent system, a response to the subsequent input, wherein the providing a response comprises the conversational agent system utilizing the integrated interpretable conversational model to replay (i) the dialog and (ii) the action script using the subsequent input.

BACKGROUND

When a user has a problem or question the user may interact with aconversational agent, for example, chatbot, digital assistant, virtualassistant, or the like. Chatbots generally capture text-based input, forexample, a user may access a conversational window and provide textinput to the window. The chatbot then processes the input and provides aresponsive output, usually as a text-based output. Digital or virtualassistants may include assistants that receive voice input, process thevoice input, and then provide a responsive output, for example, byaudio, by performing a function, or the like. Conversational agentsprovide a method for a user to receive assistance with a problem orquery that does not require a human user. The conversational agents areprogrammed to process input and provide output responsive to the inputin a manner similar to how another human would engage in theconversation.

BRIEF SUMMARY

In summary, one aspect of the invention provides a method, comprising:receiving an input from a first user requesting information, wherein aresponse to the input requires performance of an action external to adialog window; generating a conversation model from a dialog that occursbetween the user and a human agent while the human agent is respondingto the input; recording actions of the human agent performing theexternal action required to respond to the input; mapping stepsperformed during performance of the external action to conversationslots within the dialog, wherein the mapping comprises (i) identifyinginformation requested by the human agent during the dialog and (ii)determining an input step within the external action where theinformation is provided; generating, from (i) the conversational model,(ii) recorded external action, and (iii) mapped steps, an integratedinterpretable conversation model comprising a dialog and action script;receiving, at a conversational agent system, a subsequent input from asecond user requesting similar information to the information requestedby the first user; and providing, by the conversational agent system, aresponse to the subsequent input, wherein the providing a responsecomprises the conversational agent system utilizing the integratedinterpretable conversational model to replay (i) the dialog and (ii) theaction script using the subsequent input.

Another aspect of the invention provides an apparatus, comprising: atleast one processor; and a computer readable storage medium havingcomputer readable program code embodied therewith and executable by theat least one processor, the computer readable program code comprising:computer readable program code configured to receive an input from afirst user requesting information, wherein a response to the inputrequires performance of an action external to a dialog window; computerreadable program code configured to generate a conversation model from adialog that occurs between the user and a human agent while the humanagent is responding to the input; computer readable program codeconfigured to record actions of the human agent performing the externalaction required to respond to the input; computer readable program codeconfigured to map steps performed during performance of the externalaction to conversation slots within the dialog, wherein the mappingcomprises (i) identifying information requested by the human agentduring the dialog and (ii) determining an input step within the externalaction where the information is provided; computer readable program codeconfigured to generate, from (i) the conversational model, (ii) recordedexternal action, and (iii) mapped steps, an integrated interpretableconversation model comprising a dialog and action script; computerreadable program code configured to receive, at a conversational agentsystem, a subsequent input from a second user requesting similarinformation to the information requested by the first user; and computerreadable program code configured to provide, by the conversational agentsystem, a response to the subsequent input, wherein the providing aresponse comprises the conversational agent system utilizing theintegrated interpretable conversational model to replay (i) the dialogand (ii) the action script using the subsequent input.

An additional aspect of the invention provides a computer programproduct, comprising: a computer readable storage medium having computerreadable program code embodied therewith, the computer readable programcode executable by a processor and comprising: computer readable programcode configured to receive an input from a first user requestinginformation, wherein a response to the input requires performance of anaction external to a dialog window; computer readable program codeconfigured to generate a conversation model from a dialog that occursbetween the user and a human agent while the human agent is respondingto the input; computer readable program code configured to recordactions of the human agent performing the external action required torespond to the input; computer readable program code configured to mapsteps performed during performance of the external action toconversation slots within the dialog, wherein the mapping comprises (i)identifying information requested by the human agent during the dialogand (ii) determining an input step within the external action where theinformation is provided; computer readable program code configured togenerate, from (i) the conversational model, (ii) recorded externalaction, and (iii) mapped steps, an integrated interpretable conversationmodel comprising a dialog and action script; computer readable programcode configured to receive, at a conversational agent system, asubsequent input from a second user requesting similar information tothe information requested by the first user; and computer readableprogram code configured to provide, by the conversational agent system,a response to the subsequent input, wherein the providing a responsecomprises the conversational agent system utilizing the integratedinterpretable conversational model to replay (i) the dialog and (ii) theaction script using the subsequent input.

A further aspect of the invention provides a method, comprising:receiving, at a conversational agent system, an input from a userrequesting information, wherein a response to the input requiresperformance of an action external to a dialog window of theconversational agent system; identifying, at the conversational agentsystem, a response to the input, wherein the identifying comprises:identifying, from a plurality of conversation logs, a conversation modelthat corresponds to the input, wherein the conversation model comprisesa previously recorded dialog that corresponds to a similar previouslyprovided input requesting the information; the conversation modelidentifying an external action performed by an agent during provision ofa response to the input, wherein the external action is recorded in ascript; the conversation model comprising mappings of inputs providedduring the previously recorded dialog and a step within the script whereeach input is provided during performance of the external action; andreturning a response to the input by (i) replaying the identifiedconversation model using the input and dialog inputs provided by theuser during a replay of the identified conversation model and (ii)replaying the script corresponding to the conversation model to performthe external action using the input and dialog input; and providing,from the conversational agent system, the response to the user.

For a better understanding of exemplary embodiments of the invention,together with other and further features and advantages thereof,reference is made to the following description, taken in conjunctionwith the accompanying drawings, and the scope of the claimed embodimentsof the invention will be pointed out in the appended claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates a method of training a conversational agent torespond to inputs that require execution of an external action using anintegrated interpretable model.

FIG. 2 illustrates an example of generation of an integratedinterpretable model.

FIG. 3 illustrates a computer system.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

It will be readily understood that the components of the embodiments ofthe invention, as generally described and illustrated in the figuresherein, may be arranged and designed in a wide variety of differentconfigurations in addition to the described exemplary embodiments. Thus,the following more detailed description of the embodiments of theinvention, as represented in the figures, is not intended to limit thescope of the embodiments of the invention, as claimed, but is merelyrepresentative of exemplary embodiments of the invention.

Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment” or “anembodiment” (or the like) means that a particular feature, structure, orcharacteristic described in connection with the embodiment is includedin at least one embodiment of the invention. Thus, appearances of thephrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” or the like in variousplaces throughout this specification are not necessarily all referringto the same embodiment.

Furthermore, the described features, structures, or characteristics maybe combined in any suitable manner in at least one embodiment. In thefollowing description, numerous specific details are provided to give athorough understanding of embodiments of the invention. One skilled inthe relevant art may well recognize, however, that embodiments of theinvention can be practiced without at least one of the specific detailsthereof, or can be practiced with other methods, components, materials,et cetera. In other instances, well-known structures, materials, oroperations are not shown or described in detail to avoid obscuringaspects of the invention.

The illustrated embodiments of the invention will be best understood byreference to the figures. The following description is intended only byway of example and simply illustrates certain selected exemplaryembodiments of the invention as claimed herein. It should be noted thatthe flowchart and block diagrams in the figures illustrate thearchitecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementationsof systems, apparatuses, methods and computer program products accordingto various embodiments of the invention. In this regard, each block inthe flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, orportion of code, which comprises at least one executable instruction forimplementing the specified logical function(s).

It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, thefunctions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in thefigures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, beexecuted substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes beexecuted in the reverse order, depending upon the functionalityinvolved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagramsand/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the blockdiagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by specialpurpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions oracts, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computerinstructions.

Specific reference will be made here below to FIGS. 1-3. It should beappreciated that the processes, arrangements and products broadlyillustrated therein can be carried out on, or in accordance with,essentially any suitable computer system or set of computer systems,which may, by way of an illustrative and non-restrictive example,include a system or server such as that indicated at 12′ in FIG. 3. Inaccordance with an example embodiment, most if not all of the processsteps, components and outputs discussed with respect to FIGS. 1-2 can beperformed or utilized by way of a processing unit or units and systemmemory such as those indicated, respectively, at 16′ and 28′ in FIG. 3,whether on a server computer, a client computer, a node computer in adistributed network, or any combination thereof.

The artificial intelligence that conversational agents use has becomebetter allowing the conversation to become more accurate and closer to aconversation with another person. For example, the natural languagegeneration and understanding has improved so that the conversationalagent system can more accurately identify the user request and provide amore accurate response or result. Additionally, using data analytics andcollaborative filtering has also made the conversation system moreaccurate and more human-like.

Conventional conversational agents have become very good at respondingto requests or inputs that are dialog-based. Specifically, theconversational agents include a dialog model that allows theconversational agent to respond to user requests or inputs. The dialogmodel is learned by the conversational agent from conversation logs. Theconversational agent can then use these conversation logs to identifywhat responses are to be provided when presented with an input from auser. However, the conventional conversational agent is unable to learnactions. In other words, if a user input requires the conversationalagent to perform an action, specifically an action that is external tothe dialog window of the conversational agent, the conversational agentis unable to perform this action. Typically, if the user input requiresan action, the conversational agent has to feed this input to a humanagent who performs the action and then provides input back to theconversational agent to provide back to the user. While someconversational agents can perform some actions (e.g., submitting anorder, submitting a repair ticket, etc.), these conversational agentsare specifically designed by experts to perform these actions and theconversational agent cannot learn any new actions, unless specificallyprogrammed by a programmer, and cannot fix any issues that areencountered during performance of these actions.

Accordingly, an embodiment provides a system and method for training aconversational agent to respond to inputs that require execution of anexternal action using an integrated interpretable model. Theconversational agent system first enters a training or learning mode.During this learning mode the system records actions performed by ahuman agent. The human agent receives an input from a user requestinginformation. This input requires performance of an action external to adialog window. For example, the user may access a conversation windowthat allows for text-based communication with a customer service agentor other human agent. During the course of this text-basedcommunication, the human agent may have to access a system, application,or window external to the dialog window in order to provide a responseto the user.

From the dialog that occurs between the user and the human agent, thesystem generates a conversation model that represents the inputsprovided by both the user and the human agent. Additionally, while thehuman agent performs the external action, the system records the humanagent. The system then maps steps that were performed during theexternal action to conversation slots within the dialog. Theconversation slots are those dialog points that are identified as thehuman agent requesting information from the user that is required toperform the external action. Thus, the mapping includes identifyinginformation requested by the human agent during the dialog anddetermining a step, for example, an input step, within the externalaction where the information was provided. From the conversation model,the recorded external action, and the mapped steps, the system cangenerate an integrated interpretable conversation model that includesboth a dialog and an action script.

The integrated interpretable conversation model can be used by aconversational agent system when the conversational agent systemreceives a new input from a new user that is similar to the input thatwas provided when generating the integrated interpretable conversationmodel. In other words, the system can identify similarities between aninput provided by a user and an input that was provided that resulted ingeneration of an integrated model. The system can then access theappropriate integrated model and use this model to respond to the inputof the user. Responding to the input includes the conversational agentsystem replaying the dialog and the action script using the inputprovided during this new conversation. In other words, since theintegrated model identifies what input is provided within what step ofthe action script, the conversational agent can request that input andthen perform the steps of the action script in order to return aresponse to the user.

Such a system provides a technical improvement over conventionalconversational agent systems by providing a conversational agent systemthat can respond to user inputs even if the response requires executionof actions that are external to a dialog window of the conversationalagent. In other words, the described system and method provides aconversational agent that can perform actions external to the dialogwindow, which is not possible with conventional conversational agents.Specifically, the described conversational agent system can learn how toperform actions by using recordings of human agents performing similaractions. In other words, much like conventional conversational agentscan learn dialog from conversational logs, the described conversationalagent can learn actions from action logs. Additionally, the describedconversational agent is able to repair errors that are encounteredduring execution of the dialog and/or external action, which is notpossible with conventional conversational agents.

FIG. 1 illustrates a method for training a conversational agent torespond to inputs that require execution of an external action using anintegrated interpretable model. The conversational agent system includesa learning or training mode where the conversational agent can learn howto respond to user inputs. Specifically, in this training mode thesystem records dialog and actions performed by a human agent whenresponding to a request. The conversational agent system can then usethis information to respond to similar requests without the assistanceof a human agent. Thus, during the training mode, at 101, the systemreceives an input from a user. The input may be a request forinformation from the system. The input may include any form of request,for example, a question, a statement, a command, or the like.Additionally, the input may have a response that requires theperformance of an action external to the dialog window where the requestwas provided. For example, the user may provide a request to look up thestatus of a payment or order. Determining this status may requireaccessing a payment system or an order system, either of which areapplications or systems outside the dialog window of the conversationsystem.

The user may provide the input using a user device, for example, alaptop, smart phone, tablet, digital assistant device, or any otherinformation handling device. Accordingly, the input request may beprovided in different formats, for example, as an audio input,text-based input, video-based input, or the like. Depending on thesystem the input may be converted to a different format. For example,the system may require text-based input. Therefore, the system mayinclude functionality that can convert audio, video, or othernon-text-based inputs into a text-based input, for example, naturallanguage processing, speech-to-text processing, and the like.

At 102 the system may generate a conversation model from a dialog thatoccurs between the user and the human agent while the human agent isresponding to the input. In other words, while the human agent converseswith the user to obtain information needed to perform the request, thesystem may record the dialog and generate a conversation model from thedialog. Generating the conversation model may include identifying anintent of the conversation or dialog. This intent may correspond to thedesired response or request of the user. Using the example of the userrequesting the status of the payment, the intent may be identified asdetermining the status of a payment. The system may turn the intent intoa condition, so that upon subsequent user inputs or requests, the systemcan determine if the request meets the condition. In other words, uponsubsequent requests, the system can determine if the request meets thecondition so it can determine what conversation model to access, asdiscussed in more detail herein.

The conversation model may include conversation slots. These slotsidentify portions of the dialog where the agent has requested an inputfrom the user. This input is an input that is necessary for providing aresponse to the request. Using the payment example, the agent mayrequest the user to provide an account number and a telephone numberthat is on file for the user. These requests by the agent and subsequentresponses provided by the user may be identified as conversation slots.Thus, the conversation model identifies these conversation slots,including the prompts that were provided by the agent in order to obtainthe necessary information.

At 103 the system may record the human agent performing the externalaction that is required to respond to the input or request of the user.When the agent minimizes the dialog window, or otherwise makes thedialog window an “inactive” window, the system may start a recording ofthe actions being taken by the agent. An inactive window includes awindow, screen, or application that is not the currently active windowor window currently receiving input, even if the window is still visibleon the display screen. As the agent performs whatever actions arerequired for processing the request and obtaining the desiredinformation, the system makes note or records these activities. Theseactivities may include an agent opening a new window, opening anapplication, providing input (e.g., clicking an icon, providing keyboardinput, providing touchscreen input, etc.), or the like. From theserecorded activities, the system may generate a script that identifieswhat actions were performed. This script may be both human readable andmachine executable, meaning it is understandable by a human and alsoexecutable by a machine.

At 104 the system may map steps that were performed during performanceor execution of the external action to conversation slots within thedialog. In other words, the input identified in the conversation slotsas being necessary for the performance of the external action is mappedto the step where that input was provided within the external action.Using the payment example, the conversational slot that identified theuser account number is mapped to the step in the external action wherethe user account number was provided. Similarly, the conversational slotthat identified the user phone number is mapped to the step in theexternal action where the user phone number was provided. Thus, themapping includes identifying the information requested by the agentduring the dialog and determining the step within the external actionthat the information was provided.

The system then generates an integrated interpretable conversation modelat 105. An integrated interpretable conversation model is a conversationmodel that includes both the dialog and the actions performed during theexternal action and is able to be executed by a machine. The integratedinterpretable conversation model is generated from the conversationalmodel, the recorded external action, and the mapped steps and includes adialog and action script. The dialog is identified from theconversational model and the action script is identified from theexternal action recorded. However, in order to use the dialog and actionscripts during a later or subsequent user request, the system may firstparameterize the inputs and external actions based upon the mappingperformed at 104. In other words, if the dialog and the action scriptinclude exactly what was performed during this training session, theconversational agent system would not be able to correctly respond tothe user unless the values were exactly the same as was recorded duringthe training session. Thus, the system instead illustrates theconversational slot input and corresponding external action step asparameters or variables, so that the conversational agent can manipulatethese variables based upon the inputs received during the subsequentrequests. Thus, the action script and the dialog may include theseparameters or indication of these parameters so that the conversationalagent knows what to request or prompt the user for and where to use theinformation provided in response to the request.

FIG. 2 illustrates an example system for generating the integratedinterpretable conversation model. In other words, FIG. 2 illustrates anexample training system or mode of the system. The dialog 201 of theconversation between the agent and the user is recorded. During thisconversation the agent may request additional information from the user,for example, information necessary for fulfilling the request. In thisexample, these prompts are identified as X and Y, and the responses areidentified as X₁ and Y₁. From the conversation, the system can identifythe intent 202 and the conversation slots 203. As stated above, theconversation slots are those conversation or dialog turns that requestor result in learning the information necessary for performing theexternal action. The agent then identifies what action needs to beperformed and starts performing that action 204. Once the agent startsperforming the action, the external task recording is started 205. Asthe agent performs the necessary actions 206 to perform the externaltask, the system records the steps into a script 207. The system alsoidentifies what output provided by the external task is used to providethe response to the request to the user, identified as Z in thisexample.

From the recorded dialog and recorded external task or action the systemlearns and generates an integrated model. From the dialog the systemlearns the conversation model 208. The conversation model identifies thecondition, which is identified from the intent, and the conversationalslots, including the response provided by the user and the promptprovided by the agent to get the response. From the external actionrecording, the system learns the external actions 209. For example, thesystem learns what input is necessary, what output is provided, and howto use the input to get the desired output. From both the dialog and theexternal action recording the system learns the mapping or actionbinding 210 of dialog inputs or responses to external action steps. Inthis example, the system identifies that a user provided response of X₁maps to the external action step requesting X₁, Y₁ maps to Y₁, and Zmaps to the status. The system then generates the integrated model fromthe conversation model 208, external action 209, and action binding 210.

Out of training mode the system may determine whether subsequent inputis similar to previous input at 106. In other words, the conversationalagent system may receive a subsequent input or request from a seconduser. This request may request information that is similar to theinformation requested by the first user, or the user that was used togenerate the integrated model. Using the payment example, the subsequentuser may request a payment status, which is a similar request that wasmade by the first user. To determine if the subsequent request issimilar, the system may identify whether the request meets the conditionof the integrated model. In other words, the system determines if theintent of the subsequent request is the same as the intent of the firstrequest. Although only the first request is discussed herein, it shouldbe understood that the training mode may result in many differentintegrated models each having a different intent or condition. Thus, thesystem may identify which of these many different integrated models hasthe same intent and use that integrated model for responding to thesubsequent request. Thus, the first request may be any of the requeststhat were used to make any of the integrated models.

If the subsequent input is different than the first input or request at106, the system may provide a response using a human agent at 108. Thisresponse may also be recorded to create an integrated model as discussedabove. If, however, the subsequent input is the same or similar to thefirst input or request at 106, the conversational agent system mayprovide a response to the subsequent input at 107. In other words,instead of using a human agent, the system may use a conversationalagent capable of responding to the request without human intervention.

To provide a response the system may access or select the correctintegrated model that corresponds to or most closely resembles thesubsequent input or request. The conversational agent system may thenreplay the dialog and the action script of the integrated model usingthe subsequent input and request. Replaying the dialog and the actionscript may include prompting the user providing the subsequent input forthe information that is necessary for performing the external action asidentified in the dialog. The system may then use the providedinformation to perform the external action per the action script. Uponreceiving the desired information from the external action, the systemmay then provide the response to the user. In replaying the dialog andthe external action, the system dynamically changes the parameters ofthe dialog and the action script to match the information providedduring the dialog. In other words, the system prompts the user for Xinformation and then provides this value to the external action so thatan output can be provided by the external action.

During provision of the response, the conversational agent may encountererrors in providing the response. In other words, even though theconversational agent is using the integrated model, the dialog and/orexternal action may not occur exactly like the integrated modelillustrates. As an example, the user may provide incorrect informationwhich may result in an error by the external action, specifically thatusing the input provided in the external action cannot provide anoutput. In this case the conversational agent can automatically repairthe integrated model during the dialog. In this example the system candetermine what external action step resulted in the error and whichdialog input corresponds to this external action step. The system canthen request that the user provide a corrected input based upon whatdialog input was determined to be the cause of the error. As an example,if the user provides an incorrect account number, the system maydetermine that the external action failed at the step that required theaccount number. Thus, the system can request that the user confirm theaccount number. Using this new information, the system can rerun theexternal action and get a result.

As another example, while executing the integrated model, the system maydetermine that an error was made in an assumption made by the system,thereby resulting in the inability to provide an output. In this case,the system can adjust a mapping between a dialog input and an externalaction step. In other words, the system may recommend that a newconversational slot related to the mapping be provided in order toaccount for the incorrect assumption. Additionally or alternatively, thesystem can request a new value from the user and use this new value tooverride the old value.

As an example, a user may request a status of a policy and provide thename of the user and the policy number. However, when performing theexternal action, the system determines that there is an error inproviding the output. Thus, the system may request the user to correctthe input. In response to this prompt, the user may identify that he/sheis requesting a policy status on behalf of another user. Thus, theassumption made by the system that the user name corresponds to thepolicy number is incorrect. Accordingly, the system may adjust themapping between the original user name and the newly provided user namewhich corresponds to the actual policy holder, thereby repairing theintegrated model.

As another example, the system may encounter an ambiguity whileexecuting the integrated model. To resolve this ambiguity, and, therebyrepair the integrated model, the system may try a first input populationinto the external action. In the case that this input population fails,the system may attempt an alternate input population. In other words,the system may provide a first order of inputs to the external action.If that fails, the system may change the order to another order and trythis order of inputs in the external action. Changing the input ordermay continue until an output is returned by the external action, therebyrepairing the integrated model.

As an example, a user may provide multiple inputs in response to asingle response, for example, the user may provide a user name and phonenumber in response to an identification prompt. Thus, the system may beconfronted with the ambiguity of whether the user name or the phonenumber goes into an input slot within the external action. Thus, thesystem may try the user name and then the phone number. If that does notwork, the system may then try the phone number and then the user name.Thus, even if the system receives an input error, has an incorrectassumption, or is confronted with an ambiguity, the system is able toautomatically repair the integrated model and still provide a responseto the user without requiring human intervention.

Thus, the described conversational agent system represents a significanttechnical improvement over conventional conversational agents in that itprovides a conversational agent that can not only learn dialog andconversational states, as with conventional conversational agents, butit can also learn actions and how to perform the actions. Additionally,the described system can resolve issues that occur during the dialog andperformance of the actions, thereby repairing the conversation, which isa not possible using a conventional conversational agent. Thus, thedescribed system and methods are more efficient and effective thantraditional conversational agents. Additionally, the describedconversational agent is more flexible than the traditional systems inthat it can respond to more requests than the traditional systems,specifically requests that require the performance of an action externalto the dialog system.

As shown in FIG. 3, computer system/server 12′ in computing node 10′ isshown in the form of a general-purpose computing device. The componentsof computer system/server 12′ may include, but are not limited to, atleast one processor or processing unit 16′, a system memory 28′, and abus 18′ that couples various system components including system memory28′ to processor 16′. Bus 18′ represents at least one of any of severaltypes of bus structures, including a memory bus or memory controller, aperipheral bus, an accelerated graphics port, and a processor or localbus using any of a variety of bus architectures. By way of example, andnot limitation, such architectures include Industry StandardArchitecture (ISA) bus, Micro Channel Architecture (MCA) bus, EnhancedISA (EISA) bus, Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) localbus, and Peripheral Component Interconnects (PCI) bus.

Computer system/server 12′ typically includes a variety of computersystem readable media. Such media may be any available media that areaccessible by computer system/server 12′, and include both volatile andnon-volatile media, removable and non-removable media.

System memory 28′ can include computer system readable media in the formof volatile memory, such as random access memory (RAM) 30′ and/or cachememory 32′. Computer system/server 12′ may further include otherremovable/non-removable, volatile/non-volatile computer system storagemedia. By way of example only, storage system 34′ can be provided forreading from and writing to a non-removable, non-volatile magnetic media(not shown and typically called a “hard drive”). Although not shown, amagnetic disk drive for reading from and writing to a removable,non-volatile magnetic disk (e.g., a “floppy disk”), and an optical diskdrive for reading from or writing to a removable, non-volatile opticaldisk such as a CD-ROM, DVD-ROM or other optical media can be provided.In such instances, each can be connected to bus 18′ by at least one datamedia interface. As will be further depicted and described below, memory28′ may include at least one program product having a set (e.g., atleast one) of program modules that are configured to carry out thefunctions of embodiments of the invention.

Program/utility 40′, having a set (at least one) of program modules 42′,may be stored in memory 28′ (by way of example, and not limitation), aswell as an operating system, at least one application program, otherprogram modules, and program data. Each of the operating systems, atleast one application program, other program modules, and program dataor some combination thereof, may include an implementation of anetworking environment. Program modules 42′ generally carry out thefunctions and/or methodologies of embodiments of the invention asdescribed herein.

Computer system/server 12′ may also communicate with at least oneexternal device 14′ such as a keyboard, a pointing device, a display24′, etc.; at least one device that enables a user to interact withcomputer system/server 12′; and/or any devices (e.g., network card,modem, etc.) that enable computer system/server 12′ to communicate withat least one other computing device. Such communication can occur viaI/O interfaces 22′. Still yet, computer system/server 12′ cancommunicate with at least one network such as a local area network(LAN), a general wide area network (WAN), and/or a public network (e.g.,the Internet) via network adapter 20′. As depicted, network adapter 20′communicates with the other components of computer system/server 12′ viabus 18′. It should be understood that although not shown, other hardwareand/or software components could be used in conjunction with computersystem/server 12′. Examples include, but are not limited to: microcode,device drivers, redundant processing units, external disk drive arrays,RAID systems, tape drives, and data archival storage systems, etc.

This disclosure has been presented for purposes of illustration anddescription but is not intended to be exhaustive or limiting. Manymodifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skillin the art. The embodiments were chosen and described in order toexplain principles and practical application, and to enable others ofordinary skill in the art to understand the disclosure.

Although illustrative embodiments of the invention have been describedherein with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to beunderstood that the embodiments of the invention are not limited tothose precise embodiments, and that various other changes andmodifications may be affected therein by one skilled in the art withoutdeparting from the scope or spirit of the disclosure.

The present invention may be a system, a method, and/or a computerprogram product. The computer program product may include a computerreadable storage medium (or media) having computer readable programinstructions thereon for causing a processor to carry out aspects of thepresent invention.

The computer readable storage medium can be a tangible device that canretain and store instructions for use by an instruction executiondevice. The computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but isnot limited to, an electronic storage device, a magnetic storage device,an optical storage device, an electromagnetic storage device, asemiconductor storage device, or any suitable combination of theforegoing. A non-exhaustive list of more specific examples of thecomputer readable storage medium includes the following: a portablecomputer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), aread-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROMor Flash memory), a static random access memory (SRAM), a portablecompact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), a digital versatile disk (DVD),a memory stick, a floppy disk, a mechanically encoded device such aspunch-cards or raised structures in a groove having instructionsrecorded thereon, and any suitable combination of the foregoing. Acomputer readable storage medium, as used herein, is not to be construedas being transitory signals per se, such as radio waves or other freelypropagating electromagnetic waves, electromagnetic waves propagatingthrough a waveguide or other transmission media (e.g., light pulsespassing through a fiber-optic cable), or electrical signals transmittedthrough a wire.

Computer readable program instructions described herein can bedownloaded to respective computing/processing devices from a computerreadable storage medium or to an external computer or external storagedevice via a network, for example, the Internet, a local area network, awide area network and/or a wireless network. The network may comprisecopper transmission cables, optical transmission fibers, wirelesstransmission, routers, firewalls, switches, gateway computers and/oredge servers. A network adapter card or network interface in eachcomputing/processing device receives computer readable programinstructions from the network and forwards the computer readable programinstructions for storage in a computer readable storage medium withinthe respective computing/processing device.

Computer readable program instructions for carrying out operations ofthe present invention may be assembler instructions,instruction-set-architecture (ISA) instructions, machine instructions,machine dependent instructions, microcode, firmware instructions,state-setting data, or either source code or object code written in anycombination of one or more programming languages, including an objectoriented programming language such as Smalltalk, C++ or the like, andconventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C”programming language or similar programming languages. The computerreadable program instructions may execute entirely on the user'scomputer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone softwarepackage, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computeror entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario,the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through anytype of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide areanetwork (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer(for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).In some embodiments, electronic circuitry including, for example,programmable logic circuitry, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA), orprogrammable logic arrays (PLA) may execute the computer readableprogram instructions by utilizing state information of the computerreadable program instructions to personalize the electronic circuitry,in order to perform aspects of the present invention.

Aspects of the present invention are described herein with reference toflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus(systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of theinvention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchartillustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in theflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented bycomputer readable program instructions. These computer readable programinstructions may be provided to a processor of a general purposecomputer, special purpose computer, or other programmable dataprocessing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions,which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmabledata processing apparatus, create means for implementing thefunctions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block orblocks. These computer readable program instructions may also be storedin a computer readable storage medium that can direct a computer, aprogrammable data processing apparatus, and/or other devices to functionin a particular manner, such that the computer readable storage mediumhaving instructions stored therein comprises an article of manufactureincluding instructions which implement aspects of the function/actspecified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.

The computer readable program instructions may also be loaded onto acomputer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other deviceto cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer,other programmable apparatus or other device to produce a computerimplemented process, such that the instructions which execute on thecomputer, other programmable apparatus, or other device implement thefunctions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block orblocks.

The flowchart and block diagrams in the figures illustrate thearchitecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementationsof systems, methods, and computer program products according to variousembodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in theflowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portionof instructions, which comprises one or more executable instructions forimplementing the specified logical function(s). In some alternativeimplementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of theorder noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in successionmay, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks maysometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon thefunctionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of theblock diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocksin the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implementedby special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specifiedfunctions or acts or carry out combinations of special purpose hardwareand computer instructions.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method, comprising: receiving an input from afirst user requesting information, wherein a response to the inputrequires performance of an action external to a dialog window;generating a conversation model from a dialog that occurs between theuser and a human agent while the human agent is responding to the input;recording actions of the human agent performing the external actionrequired to respond to the input; mapping steps performed duringperformance of the external action to conversation slots within thedialog, wherein the mapping comprises (i) identifying informationrequested by the human agent during the dialog and (ii) determining aninput step within the external action where the information is provided;generating, from (i) the conversational model, (ii) recorded externalaction, and (iii) mapped steps, an integrated interpretable conversationmodel comprising a dialog and action script; receiving, at aconversational agent system, a subsequent input from a second userrequesting similar information to the information requested by the firstuser; and providing, by the conversational agent system, a response tothe subsequent input, wherein the providing a response comprises theconversational agent system utilizing the integrated interpretableconversational model to replay (i) the dialog and (ii) the action scriptusing the subsequent input.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein thegenerating a conversation model comprises identifying an intent of thedialog; and wherein the receiving a subsequent input comprisesidentifying that the subsequent input has the same intent as theidentified intent of the dialog.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein theproviding a response comprises the conversational agent system promptingthe second user based upon the conversation slots of the dialog.
 4. Themethod of claim 1, comprising parameterizing the recorded externalaction based upon inputs provided during the external action to generatethe action script.
 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the replaying theaction script comprises dynamically changing the parameters using inputsprovided during the subsequent dialog.
 6. The method of claim 1,comprising repairing the integrated interpretable conversational modelduring a dialog corresponding to the subsequent input after identifyingan input error while executing the integrated interpretableconversational model; and wherein the repairing comprises (i)determining an external action step resulting in the error and a dialoginput corresponding to the external action step and (ii) requesting thesecond user provide a corrected input based upon the determined dialoginput.
 7. The method of claim 1, comprising repairing the integratedinterpretable conversational model during a dialog corresponding to thesubsequent input after identifying an assumption error while executingthe integrated interpretable conversational model; and wherein therepairing comprises adjusting a mapping between a dialog input and astep of the external action.
 8. The method of claim 1, comprisingrepairing the integrated interpretable conversational model during adialog corresponding to the subsequent input after identifying anambiguity in input provided by the second user during the dialog; andwherein the repairing comprises executing steps of the external actionusing alternative inputs of the dialog, wherein the alternative inputsof the dialog are based upon the ambiguity.
 9. The method of claim 1,wherein the recording comprises recording at least one action selectedfrom the group consisting of: an opened application, an opened window,and a provided input.
 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the actionscript is human readable and machine executable.
 11. An apparatus,comprising: at least one processor; and a computer readable storagemedium having computer readable program code embodied therewith andexecutable by the at least one processor, the computer readable programcode comprising: computer readable program code configured to receive aninput from a first user requesting information, wherein a response tothe input requires performance of an action external to a dialog window;computer readable program code configured to generate a conversationmodel from a dialog that occurs between the user and a human agent whilethe human agent is responding to the input; computer readable programcode configured to record actions of the human agent performing theexternal action required to respond to the input; computer readableprogram code configured to map steps performed during performance of theexternal action to conversation slots within the dialog, wherein themapping comprises (i) identifying information requested by the humanagent during the dialog and (ii) determining an input step within theexternal action where the information is provided; computer readableprogram code configured to generate, from (i) the conversational model,(ii) recorded external action, and (iii) mapped steps, an integratedinterpretable conversation model comprising a dialog and action script;computer readable program code configured to receive, at aconversational agent system, a subsequent input from a second userrequesting similar information to the information requested by the firstuser; and computer readable program code configured to provide, by theconversational agent system, a response to the subsequent input, whereinthe providing a response comprises the conversational agent systemutilizing the integrated interpretable conversational model to replay(i) the dialog and (ii) the action script using the subsequent input.12. A computer program product, comprising: a computer readable storagemedium having computer readable program code embodied therewith, thecomputer readable program code executable by a processor and comprising:computer readable program code configured to receive an input from afirst user requesting information, wherein a response to the inputrequires performance of an action external to a dialog window; computerreadable program code configured to generate a conversation model from adialog that occurs between the user and a human agent while the humanagent is responding to the input; computer readable program codeconfigured to record actions of the human agent performing the externalaction required to respond to the input; computer readable program codeconfigured to map steps performed during performance of the externalaction to conversation slots within the dialog, wherein the mappingcomprises (i) identifying information requested by the human agentduring the dialog and (ii) determining an input step within the externalaction where the information is provided; computer readable program codeconfigured to generate, from (i) the conversational model, (ii) recordedexternal action, and (iii) mapped steps, an integrated interpretableconversation model comprising a dialog and action script; computerreadable program code configured to receive, at a conversational agentsystem, a subsequent input from a second user requesting similarinformation to the information requested by the first user; and computerreadable program code configured to provide, by the conversational agentsystem, a response to the subsequent input, wherein the providing aresponse comprises the conversational agent system utilizing theintegrated interpretable conversational model to replay (i) the dialogand (ii) the action script using the subsequent input.
 13. The computerprogram product of claim 12, wherein the generating a conversation modelcomprises identifying an intent of the dialog; and wherein the receivinga subsequent input comprises identifying that the subsequent input hasthe same intent as the identified intent of the dialog.
 14. The computerprogram product of claim 12, wherein the providing a response comprisesthe conversational agent system prompting the second user based upon theconversation slots of the dialog.
 15. The computer program product ofclaim 12, comprising parameterizing the recorded external action basedupon inputs provided during the external action to generate the actionscript; and wherein the replaying the action script comprisesdynamically changing the parameters using inputs provided during thesubsequent dialog.
 16. The computer program product of claim 12,comprising repairing the integrated interpretable conversational modelduring a dialog corresponding to the subsequent input after identifyingan input error while executing the integrated interpretableconversational model; and wherein the repairing comprises (i)determining an external action step resulting in the error and a dialoginput corresponding to the external action step and (ii) requesting thesecond user provide a corrected input based upon the determined dialoginput.
 17. The computer program product of claim 12, comprisingrepairing the integrated interpretable conversational model during adialog corresponding to the subsequent input after identifying anassumption error while executing the integrated interpretableconversational model; and wherein the repairing comprises adjusting amapping between a dialog input and a step of the external action. 18.The computer program product of claim 12, comprising repairing theintegrated interpretable conversational model during a dialogcorresponding to the subsequent input after identifying an ambiguity ininput provided by the second user during the dialog; and wherein therepairing comprises executing steps of the external action usingalternative inputs of the dialog, wherein the alternative inputs of thedialog are based upon the ambiguity.
 19. The computer program product ofclaim 12, wherein the recording comprises recording at least one actionselected from the group consisting of: an opened application, an openedwindow, and a provided input.
 20. A method, comprising: receiving, at aconversational agent system, an input from a user requestinginformation, wherein a response to the input requires performance of anaction external to a dialog window of the conversational agent system;identifying, at the conversational agent system, a response to theinput, wherein the identifying comprises: identifying, from a pluralityof conversation logs, a conversation model that corresponds to theinput, wherein the conversation model comprises a previously recordeddialog that corresponds to a similar previously provided inputrequesting the information; the conversation model identifying anexternal action performed by an agent during provision of a response tothe input, wherein the external action is recorded in a script; theconversation model comprising mappings of inputs provided during thepreviously recorded dialog and a step within the script where each inputis provided during performance of the external action; and returning aresponse to the input by (i) replaying the identified conversation modelusing the input and dialog inputs provided by the user during a replayof the identified conversation model and (ii) replaying the scriptcorresponding to the conversation model to perform the external actionusing the input and dialog input; and providing, from the conversationalagent system, the response to the user.